Item 1 "Searching clients belongings" refers to one event.
I took some hypodermic needles from a client, and told another PNA that I thought he might have more contraband. After the client left, the PNA said that someone might have said that someone thought the client had drugs. That PNA was mad at me. There was no other incident involved in the "searching" comment
No other staff member was as successful as me at finding contraband.
Item 2 "Giving inappropriate information"
When I had doubts about something I would ask someone. I asked many times to be given examples of what I was providing that was inappropriate. The only examples of "inappropriate materials" were a Naltrexone paper made by the Salvation Army, and a paper on hep-C made by the U.S. Government.
Item 3 "Wasn't even borderline" referred to the hep-C paper. A young PNA told me I had to get approval to put up a paper by the NIH on Hep-C. I asked why I all of a sudden had to get approval to put up circulars. I had put up dozens of circulars on dozens of topics. This is the same PNA above. She was angry at me and used her relationship with the supervisor to act out her anger.
Item 4 No ROI's were needed. Nobody ever asked to see the emails that supposedly needed ROI's, so nobody could know if they required ROI's. They did not. They are on the website.
Item 5 "provide information outside those parameters"
The example the supervisor used, was my getting outpatient info for a client that was leaving in a few days. The supervisor in that unit had not done her job. I was doing it. No reasonable person can say that it is wrong to get outpatient information for a client that is leaving. Staff who were having sex with a client were never questioned about letting "their" client view pornography.